Reviews

2.7
Based on 2 reviews and 18 answers
0
0
0
0
0
"I wish I knew about this website when I was about to choose School"
Lisa, parent
"Finally, one can access the opinions of other students completely transparently."
Fredrik, student
Get access to exclusive content, available only on SchoolParrot!
1 month
A$2.99
First month. Then A$4.99 / month
1 year
A$19
Best valueFirst year. Then A$39 / year.

For Schools and school staff

Do you work as a principal or school staff? Take control of your SchoolParrot profile. Click here
Parent
Mar 30, 2026

Serious concerns dismissed without assurance

When we approached senior staff at NRSHS with concerns about teacher conduct and professional boundaries, we were treated dismissively and given vague assurances that the matter had been addressed. When we pressed for material assurance, our daughter was punished in retaliation. They prioritise their own reputation over student safety every step of the way. We've had 6 months of high stress trying in vain to get answers from senior staff, it's been a horrible experience. Definitely wish we never considered NRSHS and would never recommend anyone send their child here.
Former Student
Feb 24, 2023

This is one of the best public schools in rocky

The teachers are kind to those who are kind back. I was able to grow both academically and socially. I was also given many opportunities to participate in extracurricular activities such in all areas.
However your experience, whether positive or negative, is influenced by the peers in your grade and their behaviours.
Berserker Street, 4701, Frenchville
Janet Young
07 4924 7888

About SchoolParrot

  • SchoolParrot is a review site for schools. We are a company that believes in more transparency within schools. Our platform is open to all users.
    Read about SchoolParrot and our company
  • Reviews are published in real-time without moderation and we want to encourage our users to provide constructive feedback and keep a serious tone. The responsibility lies with the user.
    Read our review guidelines